On May 11, 2016, Hari Nef delivered a powerful and thought-provoking speech titled "The Aesthetics of Survival" at a TEDx event. In this address, Nef, an American actress, model, and writer, challenged societal expectations of femininity, particularly when it comes to transgender women, while advocating for the importance of survival aesthetics - an argument centered around self-expression, gender, and safety.
Nef’s speech explores how mainstream feminism, often defined by narrow standards of beauty and behavior, can exclude those whose aesthetics are seen as too feminine, too flashy, or too performative. At the heart of her message is a call to redefine feminism so that it accommodates the realities of trans existence, where the way one presents themselves can literally mean the difference between life and death. Nef’s journey into the public eye began with her breakout role as Gittel in the Amazon series Transparent, a show that brought transgender narratives into the mainstream. She also became the first openly transgender woman to sign with IMG Models, and, more remarkably, the first to appear on the cover of a major British magazine. But beyond these groundbreaking achievements, Nef has consistently written and spoken on the intersection of fine art, gender, sexuality, and identity - providing a unique and nuanced perspective on gender expression. Through this TEDx speech, Nef shifts the conversation from merely intellectualizing about gender and feminism to making it tangible and real for those who live it.
.jpg)
Nef begins her speech with a reference to Caitlyn Jenner’s historic cover on Vanity Fair in 2015. While Jenner’s transition was widely celebrated, it also came under intense scrutiny. Nef reflects on the polarized reactions to Jenner’s appearance, specifically the critique from some feminists who saw her portrayal as reinforcing traditional, stereotypical femininity. In her words, some critics “slam” Jenner’s decision to present herself as “a cleavage-boosting corset, sultry poses, thick mascara,” arguing that such a portrayal perpetuates sexist standards of beauty and undermines feminist progress. However, Nef pushes back against this criticism, emphasizing that femininity in any form, especially the glamorous, “femme” version, should not be demonized simply because it aligns with dominant beauty ideals. Nef acknowledges the validity of the critique but counters that femininity - whether it’s in the form of hair, makeup, or nails - can be an essential tool for survival, particularly for transgender women.
These expressions of femininity may not only help trans women “get jobs, make friends, or ride the subway home safely at night,” but they can also be a source of empowerment. The aesthetics of femininity, for Nef, are not inherently oppressive; they are pragmatic choices, often necessary for navigating a society that tends to marginalize or even endanger trans women. Her argument is that it’s time to broaden the concept of feminism to include trans women who rely on these survival aesthetics. Feminism, she insists, must embrace the diversity of womanhood, including those whose ways of expressing femininity might not align with more traditional or "respectable" feminist ideals. As Nef puts it, it is time to “free the femme,” allowing women - especially trans women - to choose their gender presentation freely without the burden of judgment or exclusion.
The speech turns to a critical analysis of Elinor Burkett’s The Transsexual Empire: The Making of the She-Male, published in 1979, in which Burkett, a second-wave feminist, argued that transgender women were not truly women. According to Burkett, transgender women were, in essence, reinforcing stereotypical notions of femininity, which many feminists had worked so hard to dismantle. Burkett’s stance, Nef argues, is one that positions certain types of femininity as inherently problematic. This feminist viewpoint excludes those who wish to embrace or perform femininity, including transgender women, who often face extreme societal pressure to embody conventional beauty standards in order to be accepted as women.
Nef questions whether it is wrong for trans women to make changes to their bodies, through hormones, surgery, or even makeup, in an effort to align with mainstream gender expectations. She challenges the idea that altering one's body for survival makes trans women “sell-outs.” Instead, Nef reframes these actions as acts of survival, especially when the world poses such a grave threat to those who don’t fit into narrowly defined gender roles. After all, survival sometimes requires aligning with societal norms to stay safe and to gain access to the basic rights and privileges that are often denied to those who do not “pass” as cisgender. While Burkett’s feminist perspective may have had merit in its historical context, Nef suggests that today’s feminism needs to be more inclusive, flexible, and open to various forms of gender expression. The focus should shift from condemning femininity to recognizing how it can function as an instrument of survival and self-determination.
One of the most poignant moments in Nef’s speech occurs when she brings up pop star Lana Del Rey. Del Rey’s public persona, marked by heavily stylized femininity and a melancholic, retro-glam aesthetic, serves as a metaphor for Nef’s critique of mainstream expectations of femininity. Del Rey's image, especially in her early years, was often criticized for being “inauthentic” and “unnatural,” with media outlets and critics suggesting that she should tone down the makeup and “be a real woman.” Nef draws a parallel between the way Del Rey’s glamorized femininity is perceived and the way transgender women are often judged for their aesthetics. Nef reveals her own personal experience of "passing" - the act of being perceived as a cisgender woman in public. For many trans women, the ability to pass can influence how they navigate the world.
Nef shares that passing has been a source of both relief and difficulty for her, recognizing that society's standards of beauty and gender are often unforgiving. But she also questions why a person’s gender expression should be deemed valid only if it conforms to a certain ideal of “natural” or “authentic” womanhood. Del Rey, she argues, challenges these notions by presenting a version of femininity that embraces glamour and artifice, offering a “man-loving woman” image that transcends the constraints of "real" womanhood. Through this analysis of Lana Del Rey, Nef underscores her point: femininity, as expressed through aesthetic choices, is a complex and personal experience, and it is unfair to impose a narrow, exclusionary definition of womanhood that discredits the experiences of many women - particularly trans women.
Nef’s speech also includes a deeply personal reflection on her own experiences of transitioning. She recalls a time before she began hormone therapy when she struggled to meet the expectations of femininity that society imposed on her. She wore makeup, shaved her body, and endured painful procedures like laser hair removal in order to attain a look that would help her fit into the world more comfortably. Nef candidly describes the physical and emotional pain of these procedures, but she also recognizes the necessity of these actions in a world that demands conformity to cisnormative standards. For Nef, transitioning was not merely about self-expression - it was about survival. In a world where trans women are often subjected to violence, the ability to present as a woman in a way that aligns with societal norms can be a matter of life or death. She poignantly lists a number of tragic instances in which trans women, particularly those of color, were murdered simply for being perceived as "not femme enough." These stories highlight the stakes involved in the aesthetics of survival: when a trans woman’s presentation deviates from society’s expectations of femininity, she may face severe, even lethal, consequences.
The ultimate message of Nef’s speech is a call for the liberation of feminine aesthetics. She argues that femme aesthetics, which are often dismissed as shallow or performative, should not be shamed or vilified. For some trans women, these aesthetics are essential for survival. They allow women to navigate dangerous social and physical spaces, gain access to resources, and ultimately exist in a society that might otherwise reject them. Nef urges her audience to reconsider the aesthetics of feminist respectability and to make space for women who need, or simply want, to embrace femininity as a means of self-preservation. To her, the act of being femme is not inherently good or bad; it simply “works” for some people, and that is valid. Feminism, she insists, must evolve to allow for this diversity of expression. The "aesthetics of survival" are real, necessary, and deserving of respect. Her concluding message is clear: "Free the Femme." Women, especially trans women, should be free to embrace their femininity, however they choose to express it, without fear of judgment or violence. Nef’s TEDx speech remains a powerful testament to the resilience and agency of trans women and their right to define their own identities - on their terms, without compromise.
Image credits: YouTube - TEDx Talks
.jpg)
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment